An illustration of a young woman with curly brown hair tied in a bun, wearing a yellow hoodie, sitting at her desk and focused on video editing. She is using a large monitor and a laptop. Her cozy room features brick walls, acoustic foam panels, string lights, a camera on a tripod by the window, and a bookshelf filled with tech gear. A wooden sign in the bottom right corner reads "Backyard Drunkard."

Be our strength by showing your love and support.

Support us to grow more, create more, and connect with curious minds across the world โ€” where creativity becomes a universal language.

Jessica Alba, Martha Stewart and McCall DaPron Face Backlash Over Controversial 2026 Halloween Costumes

Published on

in

Jessica Alba smiling during a public speaking event in a blue top

Halloween is usually a time for creative transformations, nostalgic references and playful celebrity costume reveals. But some choices can spark a very different conversation when they draw inspiration from real-life tragedies and serious social issues.

This year, three celebrity Halloween appearances have attracted attention for precisely that reason. What began as costume posts on social media quickly turned into discussions about sensitivity, historical trauma and where the line between Halloween humour and real-world suffering should be drawn.

Jessica Alba Faces Backlash Over Nancy Kerrigan and Tonya Harding Halloween Costume

Jessica Alba found herself at the centre of an online debate after sharing a Halloween look inspired by one of the most notorious incidents in figure-skating history.

On November 1, Alba posted photographs on Instagram showing herself dressed as American figure skater Nancy Kerrigan. Her outfit featured figure-skating-inspired clothing and a bloodied wrap around her knee, referencing the 1994 attack that left Kerrigan injured shortly before the Winter Olympics.

Her friend Kelly Sawyer, co-CEO of Baby2Baby, joined the costume theme as Tonya Harding, carrying a baseball bat. The combination made the connection to the infamous Kerrigan-Harding controversy unmistakable.

Alba captioned the photographs:

โ€œHappy Halloween from Tonya โ€ฆ and Nancy.โ€

The costumes were worn for a Halloween party hosted by Vas J. Morgan and Michael Braun, which had a โ€œHockey Horrorโ€ theme.

However, the photographs quickly generated divided reactions. Some social media users questioned the decision to turn an actual assault into a Halloween costume, while others defended the outfits as a reference to a widely recognised sports story.

Following the reaction, Alba deleted the photographs from Instagram. According to PEOPLE, however, the images remained visible on her Threads account at the time of its latest reporting, where responses were also mixed.

PEOPLE also reported that it had contacted Alba’s representative for comment. As of November 3, no public explanation from Alba regarding the Instagram deletion was included in the available reporting.

Seeing More Celebrity Halloween Looks?
Halloween 2026 also produced plenty of celebrity costume coverage beyond the controversies discussed here. Readers looking for more seasonal celebrity looks can browse our 2026 celebrity Halloween costumes roundup to compare other costumes from the season.

Why Nancy Kerrigan’s 1994 attack remains controversial

The reaction becomes easier to understand when looking at the incident behind the costumes.

On January 6, 1994, Kerrigan was attacked following a practice session at the U.S. Figure Skating Championships in Detroit. An assailant struck her on the knee, forcing her to withdraw from the competition.

The investigation eventually uncovered a conspiracy involving individuals associated with Kerrigan’s rival, Tonya Harding.

According to the U.S. Figure Skating Association’s historical archive, the plot involved Shawn Eckardt, Harding’s ex-husband Jeff Gillooly, getaway driver Derrick Smith and attacker Shane Stant.

Harding denied having prior knowledge of the plan to attack Kerrigan. She later pleaded guilty to conspiring to hinder prosecution in connection with the investigation. This plea was not a conviction for ordering the physical attack itself.

The sporting consequences were also significant. In June 1994, a U.S. Figure Skating Association hearing panel stripped Harding of her 1994 U.S. ladies’ title and banned her from USFSA membership for life. The panel concluded that her conduct violated the federation’s code of ethics and that evidence showed she had prior knowledge of the assault.

Kerrigan eventually recovered in time to compete at the 1994 Winter Olympics in Lillehammer, winning the silver medal. Harding finished eighth.

This history explains why Alba and Sawyer’s outfits prompted criticism. The costumes did not simply reference a sporting rivalry; they recreated recognisable elements of a real physical attack, including Kerrigan’s injured knee and the baseball bat associated with the incident.

Nevertheless, the response was not unanimous. Some people considered the criticism excessive and defended the costumes as Halloween entertainment. The available reporting describes a divided reaction rather than universal condemnation.

PEOPLE also covered Alba’s other family Halloween photographs. Her son Hayes appeared in a vampire costume, while her daughters Honor and Haven were also mentioned. Honor chose a costume inspired by the 2024 tennis film Challengers.

Martha Stewart Issues Apology After Homelessness Halloween Costume Sparks Criticism

While Alba’s costume referenced a historical sporting incident, Martha Stewart’s Halloween controversy centred on a serious issue affecting people across the United States: homelessness.

On October 31, Stewart shared an Instagram photograph showing herself dressed as someone experiencing homelessness. She wore ripped clothing, makeup designed to resemble dirt and carried a sign reading:

โ€œI AM HUNGRY HELP ME!!โ€

The photograph was reportedly shared alongside promotional material for Stewart’s QVC candles, with the accompanying caption promoting the products for Halloween.

The image attracted criticism and was subsequently deleted.

Stewart initially explained that she had not intended to mock people experiencing homelessness. Instead, she said her purpose was to bring attention to the issue.

In a statement shared with PEOPLE on November 1, she wrote:

โ€œI am distressed that my Halloween costume yesterday, which was intended to bring more awareness to the very serious subject of homelessness, has offended people, which was never my intention.โ€

She also highlighted her previous support for organisations addressing the crisis, adding:

โ€œHomelessness continues to remain one of America’s greatest challenges and ongoing crises, something that I care deeply about and I have spent a significant amount of time and effort supporting charities that combat this ongoing social epidemic. I am committed to continuing to make a difference.โ€

However, her initial explanation did not bring the controversy to an end.

Martha Stewart admits her Halloween costume was insensitive

Stewart subsequently released a second statement acknowledging that her earlier response had not gone far enough.

She wrote:

โ€œIt’s hard to admit when you’ve really screwed up. My earlier statement didn’t go far enough.โ€

She then directly addressed the costume itself:

โ€œI know many people are economically struggling. Wearing a costume like I did was insensitive and not funny. I am very sorry.โ€

The second statement marked a clearer acknowledgement of the criticism. Rather than focusing only on her original intention, Stewart explicitly accepted that the way she represented homelessness was inappropriate and apologised.

The wider issue also provides important context.

According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s 2025 Point-in-Time estimates, 745,652 people were experiencing homelessness on a single night in January 2025. This included 266,320 people experiencing unsheltered homelessness.

These figures highlight why presenting homelessness as a temporary Halloween appearance can be a sensitive subject.

At the same time, Stewart’s stated intention should not be overlooked. She said she wanted to raise awareness and pointed to her support for charities working against homelessness. Both her explanation and her subsequent apology form part of the reported controversy.

Stewart has previously been enthusiastic about Halloween, regularly sharing costume ideas and holiday-related content. PEOPLE has also noted that she has described the holiday as one she looks forward to.

The criticism, therefore, focused specifically on her 2026 costume and its portrayal of people experiencing homelessness, rather than her participation in Halloween celebrations generally.

McCall DaPron Deletes Kennedy Family Halloween Costume After Backlash

Another Halloween controversy emerged on October 29, when McCall DaPron shared photographs of a family costume inspired by President John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy on the day of the president’s assassination.

DaPron, who is set to appear in Hulu’s upcoming The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives: Orange County, dressed as Jacqueline Kennedy in a pink suit modelled on the outfit the first lady wore on November 22, 1963.

Her husband, Kirk DaPron, portrayed John F. Kennedy.

Their four children also participated in the family costume. According to the reporting, they portrayed Caroline Kennedy, John F. Kennedy Jr. and Secret Service agents.

DaPron captioned the Instagram photographs:

โ€œHappy Halloween ๐ŸฉทThe Kennedy’s.โ€

The post attracted criticism from users who questioned the decision to recreate the Kennedy family’s appearance on the day of the assassination.

One commenter described the costume as:

โ€œappallingly distasteful,โ€

Another criticised the portrayal of Jacqueline Kennedy on what the commenter described as the most traumatic day of her life.

DaPron first disabled comments on the post before eventually deleting the photographs. As of November 3, the available reporting had not identified a public explanation from her regarding the removal.

Why Jacqueline Kennedy’s pink suit became central to the criticism

The sensitivity surrounding the costume comes from the historical event it referenced.

President Kennedy was fatally shot in Dallas on November 22, 1963, while travelling in a presidential motorcade with Jacqueline Kennedy beside him.

DaPron’s choice was not simply a reference to the Kennedy presidency, the family’s public image or 1960s fashion. The recognisable pink outfit specifically connected the family photographs to the day of the assassination.

That distinction became central to the criticism.

The post also attracted attention because a similar Jacqueline Kennedy costume had already generated controversy during the previous Halloween season.

Julia Fox’s 2025 Jackie Kennedy Costume Had Already Sparked Similar Debate

In 2025, actor Julia Fox dressed as Jacqueline Kennedy wearing the same pink suit associated with the day President Kennedy was assassinated.

Fox’s interpretation went further by depicting the outfit with blood, prompting criticism from several people, including Jack Schlossberg, President Kennedy’s grandson.

Schlossberg publicly condemned Fox’s portrayal and argued that it glorified political violence.

Fox, however, defended her costume as an artistic statement rather than an attempt to make light of the assassination.

She argued that Jacqueline Kennedy’s decision to remain in her bloodstained clothing after the shooting carried historical meaning.

Fox described Kennedy’s decision as an:

โ€œact of extraordinary braveryโ€

She also characterised her own presentation as:

โ€œperformance, protest, and mourning all at once.โ€

The earlier controversy provides context for the reaction to DaPron’s 2026 family photographs. Both costumes drew on Jacqueline Kennedy’s recognisable appearance from November 22, 1963.

However, the situations were not identical. Fox explicitly presented her costume as an artistic and political statement, whereas DaPron’s post showed the Kennedy family as a Halloween family costume.

There is no evidence that DaPron intended to make the same artistic argument as Fox.

McCall DaPron’s Hulu Reality TV Debut Is Approaching

The Halloween controversy arrives shortly before DaPron’s introduction to a wider television audience.

She is set to appear in Hulu’s upcoming reality series The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives: Orange County, a spinoff centred on a group of mothers and influencers in Orange County.

According to Hulu’s official press information, all eight episodes are scheduled to premiere on November 12, 2026.

The series will be available on Hulu and Hulu on Disney+ for eligible bundle subscribers in the United States, with Disney+ availability internationally.

Hulu’s official cast information lists DaPron alongside:

  • Ashleigh Pease
  • Aspyn Ovard
  • Avery Woods
  • Bobbi Althoff
  • Jen Affleck
  • Jordan McClanahan
  • Madison Bontempo
  • Salomรฉ Andrea

The timing places DaPron’s costume controversy shortly before her television appearance. However, there is no evidence connecting the Halloween post or the resulting criticism to the production or release of the series.

Jessica Alba, Martha Stewart and McCall DaPron: How the Three Halloween Controversies Differ

Although the three celebrities faced criticism during the same Halloween season, their costume choices referenced very different subjects.

CelebrityHalloween costume referenceSocial media response
Jessica AlbaNancy Kerrigan and the 1994 attack, alongside Kelly Sawyer as Tonya HardingInstagram photographs deleted; images remained on Threads according to PEOPLE
Martha StewartA person experiencing homelessnessPhotograph deleted; Stewart issued two statements and apologised
McCall DaPronJacqueline and John F. Kennedy, with their children portraying family members and Secret Service agentsComments disabled before the post was deleted

The incidents share one important element: each costume drew inspiration from something that exists outside fictional Halloween entertainment.

Alba’s look referenced a real assault that became one of figure skating’s most notorious controversies. Stewart’s costume represented an ongoing social crisis involving poverty and homelessness. DaPron’s family photographs recreated the appearance of the Kennedy family on the day of a presidential assassination.

Their responses also differed.

Alba removed her Instagram photographs following divided reactions, but no public explanation for the deletion was included in the latest reporting. Stewart initially defended her intention before acknowledging the costume was insensitive and issuing an apology. DaPron disabled comments and later removed her post, without a public explanation identified in the available coverage.

It is equally important not to suggest that every viewer reacted in the same way. Alba’s costume received both criticism and support, while Stewart’s second apology also attracted supportive and critical responses.

Revisiting Last Yearโ€™s Costume Debate
The discussion around Jackie Kennedy-themed Halloween costumes did not begin with McCall DaPron in 2026. Readers interested in the earlier controversy can revisit our Julia Fox Jackie Kennedy costume debate report for more context.

Conclusion

The 2026 Halloween controversies involving Jessica Alba, Martha Stewart and McCall DaPron have highlighted the challenges celebrities can face when choosing costumes inspired by real-life tragedies and serious social issues.

While the three situations involved different circumstances, each prompted questions about how historical events, personal trauma and ongoing hardship should be represented in entertainment.

As of November 3, Alba and DaPron had not provided further public explanations for their deleted posts in the latest reporting reviewed. Stewart, meanwhile, had directly acknowledged the criticism and apologised.

Ultimately, the incidents demonstrate how a Halloween costume intended as a reference, joke or statement can generate a much broader conversation about sensitivity and the real people connected to its subject.


Source and Research Disclaimer: This article has been prepared based on research of the sources provided below, including reporting from PEOPLE and Entertainment Weekly, official Hulu press information, U.S. Figure Skating historical archives and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. It reflects the information available in those sources as of November 3, 2026, and does not imply independent verification beyond the material reviewed. Social media posts and public statements may be deleted, amended or updated after publication.

Sources

Featured Image Credit: TechCrunch / CC BY 2.0 / Wikimedia Commons

Disclaimer: This article reflects information available from the sources reviewed as of Nov. 3, 2026. Social-media posts, statements and other online material may be deleted, amended or updated after publication.

Leave a Reply

Backyard Drunkard Logo

Follow Us On


Categories