A school trip from Slovakia to the United Kingdom took a startling turn during the journey home when a group of teenagers found themselves separated from the rest of their classmates in France. What began with an alleged late-night disturbance at a hotel in Forbach quickly became a dispute involving parents, teachers, the school, a Hungarian trip organizer and lawyers.
The eight students, aged between 15 and 17, eventually made their own complicated journey home with a teacher while their parents arranged replacement transportation. But the central question now goes far beyond what happened inside the hotel that night: did the disciplinary agreement signed before the trip actually allow minors to be left abroad without their original transportation home?
More International Travel Mishaps: School trips and international travel don’t always go according to plan for other reasons too. For a different kind of unexpected detour, read our story on the Maine Bigfoot sighting that sparked a police hunt before the “creature” was finally found.
How the school trip ended up in Forbach, France
The students were from Szondy György High School in Šahy, a town in southern Slovakia. They had travelled to the United Kingdom as part of a study trip involving students from several schools.
The Hungarian organization arranging the trip was responsible for transportation, accommodation, the program and other logistical arrangements. During the return journey, the group stopped overnight in Forbach, a French town near the German border.
It was there that the final night of the trip became the center of the controversy.
According to organizer Kallós Gyopár, several of the Slovak students caused a disturbance at the hotel during the early morning hours. She alleged that students moved along a hotel corridor and repeatedly knocked on other guests’ doors, waking them and causing complaints.
The organizer said some guests became angry and threatened to call police. She also said she had access to hotel video recordings showing what happened.
That account, however, was only one part of a dispute that would soon involve the school and the students’ families.
Museums and Missing Property: Forbach isn’t the only place in France dealing with an unresolved incident right now. Our story on the Renoir Museum heist and the two paintings still missing after thieves cut through frames in a French Riviera raid covers another open case on French soil.
The decision that left eight students behind
The organizer said the students had breached disciplinary rules that their parents had agreed to before the trip.
According to her account, the agreement allowed participants to be excluded from the program following serious disciplinary violations, with their families responsible for the cost of arranging their return journey.
She said six students admitted to being involved in the hotel disturbance. When those six were told they would not continue home with the main group, two other students reportedly chose to remain with them in solidarity, despite the organizer saying they had not broken the rules themselves.
A teacher from the school also stayed with the eight teenagers.
That detail became important because the organizer has repeatedly rejected descriptions suggesting that the students were simply abandoned without adult supervision. She said the teacher remained with them and that communication continued with the school and parents.
Still, the families were faced with an unexpected problem: their children were minors in another country, and the original bus was leaving without them.
Unexpected Journeys, Happier Outcomes: Not every unplanned detour ends in dispute. For a lighter contrast, check out our story on Leah Shutkever reclaiming the burrito world record after four years, one of her 42 Guinness titles.
The moment the students realized the bus was really leaving
The teenagers reportedly did not immediately understand what was happening.
Parent Klaudia Uhor later described the moment to TN Live:
“When the bus left, they thought they were joking. After half an hour they realized, and the teacher also checked, that they would not be coming back for them. That’s when it became a reality.”
For the parents, the situation became even more urgent because the children’s travel insurance was due to expire at midnight.
Uhor explained:
“We had to act quickly because anything could have happened to them.”
The families therefore had to arrange a completely different route home.
Reconsidering Old Contracts and Practices: Disputes over agreements and their fine print keep surfacing in unexpected places. Read our story on Channel 5 giving Hunter Biden its email list before the $LAPTOP crypto launch, then removing subscriber data before the blast for another case involving a contested arrangement.
How the eight students eventually returned home
Because the original tour bus had already departed with the rest of the group, the teenagers could not simply rejoin the planned journey.
Instead, they travelled from Forbach to Frankfurt and then onward to Vienna. A replacement bus arranged and paid for by their parents then picked them up in Vienna for the final journey back to Slovakia.
Other reporting described the return as involving multiple changes before the students were finally reunited with their families.
Teacher Gábor Viczencz, who stayed with the students, described the experience to TV Markíza:
“It was hard work, but I didn’t have time to think that it couldn’t be done.”
The families ultimately paid for the replacement transportation themselves.
| Detail | Reported information |
| Students involved | Eight teenagers |
| Ages | 15 to 17 |
| School | Szondy György High School in Šahy |
| Location where they remained | Forbach, France |
| Hotel issue | Alleged nighttime disturbance and door knocking |
| Students accused of involvement | Six |
| Students who stayed in solidarity | Two |
| Adult who remained with them | Teacher Gábor Viczencz |
| Return route | Forbach → Frankfurt → Vienna → Slovakia |
| Replacement transportation | Arranged and paid for by parents |
| Insurance concern | Students’ travel insurance was due to expire at midnight |
Standards Under Scrutiny in the Ring: Disputes over who’s responsible for what aren’t limited to travel arrangements. For more, our recap of WWE’s Sunday Night’s Main Event, where Randy Orton stunned Cody Rhodes and Trick Williams reclaimed the U.S. Title offers a lighter change of subject.
Why the parents filed a criminal complaint
The families’ objection was not simply about whether their children should have faced discipline.
The central dispute concerns how that discipline was carried out and whether the organizer had the authority to exclude minors from the prearranged journey home while they were still abroad.
The parents subsequently filed a criminal complaint.
Their lawyer, Miroslav Chromý, stressed that the legal classification should be determined by the authorities handling the case rather than by either side in the dispute.
He said:
“The clarification of the facts and their legal assessment are fully in the hands of the relevant authorities dealing with the case.”
At this stage, reporting indicates that it remains unresolved whether the circumstances could amount to a criminal offence or another breach of legal obligations.
There has been no final legal determination establishing that the organizer committed a criminal offence.
Curious Science to Change the Mood: For a lighter break from a tense dispute, our story on an ancient “poop explosion” that may have helped fuel the Cambrian Explosion offers an entirely different kind of read.
The school says it did not approve the decision
The response from the Pongrácz Lajos Primary School and Szondy György High School in Šahy added another major layer to the controversy.
The school said the decision to leave the students in France was made without its prior approval or involvement. According to the school, it only learned about the decision after it had happened.
The school said it would have wanted an opportunity to intervene, contact parents and arrange a safer alternative if necessary.
Its statement said:
“The school was surprised and concerned to learn that during the return journey from the study trip to England, organized by a Hungarian civil association, the organizer did not allow six students to continue their journey on the shared bus and, together with two other students who volunteered to stay, left them in the French town of Forbach. The safety of students is the school’s highest priority, and therefore we consider such a procedure unacceptable, disproportionate and contrary to the interests of the students.”
The school has also made a distinction that matters to the ongoing dispute.
It is investigating the students’ alleged behavior rather than automatically dismissing the organizer’s account. In practical terms, the school is treating two questions separately: did the students actually violate the hotel or trip rules, and was leaving them behind an appropriate response?
Playful Food Challenges Elsewhere: For a much lighter story to close out on, read about Wendy’s T-Rex Burger returning after 13 years, complete with a 9-patty, 9-minute eating challenge.
What did the signed agreement actually allow?
This remains one of the biggest points of disagreement.
Kallós maintains that parents had signed an agreement allowing students to be excluded from the trip after serious misconduct, with families responsible for the cost of getting them home.
The school interprets that agreement differently.
Its statement says:
“It does not contain a provision authorizing the organizer to unilaterally deny minor students the pre-arranged bus transportation home, leave them abroad, or transfer responsibility for arranging their safe return to the students or their families.”
That creates a sharp divide between the two sides.
The organizer says the disciplinary provision covered the situation. The school argues that excluding a student from a program is not necessarily the same thing as removing that student from the previously arranged transportation home while leaving the minor abroad.
The legal significance of that distinction remains unresolved.
The organizer’s account of the hotel disturbance
Kallós has provided a detailed explanation of what she says happened at the Ibis hotel in Forbach.
Speaking to Vasárnap, she said:
“Our contract states that in the event of serious disorder, we exclude the participants from the project, and they arrange and pay for their own journey home. The parents signed this.”
She then described the alleged behavior:
“The students from Šahy were causing a disturbance in one of the hotel’s floors between half past one and two at night, banging on every door, waking up the guests, while their teacher was sleeping. A teacher from another participating school told me in the morning what had happened, but by then the guests had also complained and wanted to call the police.”
According to her account, six students acknowledged participating when she asked who had been knocking on doors.
She said the other two students then decided to stay with them.
Kallós also maintained that the teenagers were not left without supervision because their teacher stayed behind and communication continued with the school and parents.
The organizer now says she was too strict
One of the most significant developments came in an interview published on September 19.
Kallós said she now believes she judged the situation too harshly, although she continued to defend her account of the hotel incident.
“Now I think I judged too harshly, but there is another side to the whole thing.”
When asked whether the matter should ultimately have been handled by the school and parents rather than the travel organizer, she gave a direct response:
“now I also think that it should have been that way”.
She said the experience had also caused her to reconsider her future work organizing school trips.
“I have to reconsider my contracts and my activities as well, I think this is the end of it.”
Despite that admission, she has not withdrawn her claims about the students’ behavior.
Why the hotel incident remains disputed
Kallós said hotel guests had threatened to report the disturbance to police and maintained that video recordings supplied by the hotel supported her description of events. She said those recordings had been provided to the school.
She also said she had previously encountered serious behavioral problems involving student groups.
In the latest interview, she stated:
“My reputation is at stake, because I have been staying there for years with other groups, and I could only calm the agitated guests by telling them what consequences the students’ behavior had. I tried to calm things down, because I have already been banned from several hotels where I stayed with students.”
She also referred to earlier incidents involving student groups, including one in which students allegedly nearly set a hotel on fire and another involving drunken behavior on a ferry. Those are the organizer’s own accounts of previous incidents and have not been established by an independent investigation into the current case.
The students’ families, meanwhile, have stressed that the Forbach incident did not involve alcohol or drugs.
Father Richard Segeč said:
“There was no alcohol, no drugs, nothing like that.”
The reporting available does not establish that alcohol or drugs were involved.
What happens next?
The school has launched its own investigation into the circumstances surrounding the students’ behavior, the decision to leave them in France, and the communication and supervision arrangements.
It has requested a full written explanation from the Hungarian organization, including the legal basis for the decision. The school has also sought preservation of relevant documents and recordings.
One decision has already been announced: the school said it will not organize further study trips with the organization involved in this incident.
Meanwhile, the parents’ criminal complaint remains with the relevant authorities, who will have to establish the facts and determine whether any legal obligations were breached.
Conclusion
The Forbach incident is ultimately a dispute over more than a noisy hotel night.
The organizer says six students were involved in serious misconduct and that the disciplinary agreement signed by their parents allowed them to be excluded from the trip. Two other students stayed with them, while a teacher remained with all eight. The students later had to travel through Frankfurt and Vienna before their parents’ replacement bus brought them home.
The school disputes whether the signed agreement authorized leaving minors abroad without their planned transportation and says it did not approve the decision. The parents have filed a criminal complaint, while the school is investigating both the alleged misconduct and the way the situation was handled.
Kallós has now acknowledged that she believes she was too strict and said she may reconsider her future involvement in organizing school trips. Yet the underlying questions remain open, including exactly what happened at the hotel and what the disciplinary agreement legally permitted.
For now, the case remains unresolved, with the relevant authorities responsible for determining the facts and any potential legal consequences.
Disclaimer
This article has been prepared based on thorough research of the sources provided for the original report, including TN Live/TV Markíza, Vasárnap, Nitrak, RTL Hungary, Pravda, Daily News Hungary and Dexerto. The article reflects the information and statements contained in those sources and preserves the distinctions between confirmed information, reported accounts, allegations and disputed claims. The legal and factual issues described remain unresolved where the supplied reporting does not establish a final determination.
Sources
- TN Live / TV Markíza — Original report on the students left in Forbach
- Vasárnap — September 19 interview with trip organizer Kallós Gyopár
- Nitrak — Report on the school’s official response
- RTL Hungary — Report on the incident and parents’ complaint
- Pravda — Slovak report on the students’ return journey and legal complaint
- Daily News Hungary — English-language report with additional details on the dispute
- Dexerto — English-language report that initially brought the story to a wider online audience
Featured Image Credit:
- Valentin Ivantsov on Pexels




Leave a Reply